<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to lose customers and alienate people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/</link>
	<description>Your users experience it that way around.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:41:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-31778</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-31778</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, but scary. The examples are high profile companies who should be able to do far better. 

I could have quite a rant on this, but won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, but scary. The examples are high profile companies who should be able to do far better. </p>
<p>I could have quite a rant on this, but won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-31547</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-31547</guid>
		<description>As a programmer, I laughed at the first one.
Yep. Words like alphanumeric are very normal in my mind... Programmers need to be more careful not to use jargon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a programmer, I laughed at the first one.<br />
Yep. Words like alphanumeric are very normal in my mind&#8230; Programmers need to be more careful not to use jargon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philbuk</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-29822</link>
		<dc:creator>philbuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-29822</guid>
		<description>Wow, Emily.  What a story.  Well done for trying.

Three things to do:
- Did you video the sessions?  You can use Camtasia or Silverback to record the screen and the users&#039; faces and voices.  These videos make pretty compelling viewing and suddenly the &quot;opinion&quot; starts to be compellingly real and immediate.

- There is some maths that can help you, a bit.  &quot;Research shows&quot; that 8 users is actually quite a lot, when it comes to uncovering usability problems. There&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;important piece of research by Jakob Nielsen et al&lt;/a&gt; that demonstrates that often, 5 users can be quite sufficient.  You can also have a go at using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.measuringusability.com/wald.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;modified wald method&lt;/a&gt; to squeeze every last drop of power from your sample.  (That works better with 10-20 users, but you might still get a result with 8.)

- Consider the politics and the shape of the market you&#039;re in.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2009/06/18/uietipsderivingdesignstrategy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If there is no serious competition in the market, then there arguably is little business sense in investing in UX,&lt;/a&gt; since your users have no choice but to use you.  It&#039;s a short termist strategy, because it leaves the door wide open for a competitor.  But it can make sense if margins are low.  If there is competition, or alternative channels for customers, then you need to look at the business benefits and talk about them to senior management. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flowinteractive.com/clients&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; There&#039;s plenty of research to show that user-centred design boosts revenues and reduces costs.&lt;/a&gt;  If margins are low, it&#039;s possible that UX can improve them.  Ultimately, most businesses aren&#039;t keen on just &quot;helping the user&quot; for the hell of it.  They do it because they understand it makes business sense.

And as someone wittier than me once said:  If management really refuse to understand that customer experience matters, you&#039;d better move to another company.  Your customers will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Emily.  What a story.  Well done for trying.</p>
<p>Three things to do:<br />
- Did you video the sessions?  You can use Camtasia or Silverback to record the screen and the users&#8217; faces and voices.  These videos make pretty compelling viewing and suddenly the &#8220;opinion&#8221; starts to be compellingly real and immediate.</p>
<p>- There is some maths that can help you, a bit.  &#8220;Research shows&#8221; that 8 users is actually quite a lot, when it comes to uncovering usability problems. There&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html" rel="nofollow">important piece of research by Jakob Nielsen et al</a> that demonstrates that often, 5 users can be quite sufficient.  You can also have a go at using the <a href="http://www.measuringusability.com/wald.htm" rel="nofollow">modified wald method</a> to squeeze every last drop of power from your sample.  (That works better with 10-20 users, but you might still get a result with 8.)</p>
<p>- Consider the politics and the shape of the market you&#8217;re in.  <a href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2009/06/18/uietipsderivingdesignstrategy/" rel="nofollow">If there is no serious competition in the market, then there arguably is little business sense in investing in UX,</a> since your users have no choice but to use you.  It&#8217;s a short termist strategy, because it leaves the door wide open for a competitor.  But it can make sense if margins are low.  If there is competition, or alternative channels for customers, then you need to look at the business benefits and talk about them to senior management. <a href="http://www.flowinteractive.com/clients" rel="nofollow"> There&#8217;s plenty of research to show that user-centred design boosts revenues and reduces costs.</a>  If margins are low, it&#8217;s possible that UX can improve them.  Ultimately, most businesses aren&#8217;t keen on just &#8220;helping the user&#8221; for the hell of it.  They do it because they understand it makes business sense.</p>
<p>And as someone wittier than me once said:  If management really refuse to understand that customer experience matters, you&#8217;d better move to another company.  Your customers will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-29807</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-29807</guid>
		<description>I work in an in-house search engine marketing team for a large company that owns 6 sites and associated software products.

I&#039;ve become increasingly frustrated with glaring design flaws and terrible user experience destroying our conversion rates.

I took your suggestion at the end of this article and collected user feedback, observed 8 people using our sites and products and noted their responses, many of which were similar.

The company&#039;s response?
We can&#039;t act on opinion, only figures. This is a fob-off as the underlying attitude is &quot;our target market will use any piece of rubbish product you throw at them - we know because they did 10 years ago when we started up&quot;.
The fact that our profits have been plummeting steadily for over a year was not enough!

I&#039;m sure the frustration I feel is nothing in comparison to that of our users!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in an in-house search engine marketing team for a large company that owns 6 sites and associated software products.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve become increasingly frustrated with glaring design flaws and terrible user experience destroying our conversion rates.</p>
<p>I took your suggestion at the end of this article and collected user feedback, observed 8 people using our sites and products and noted their responses, many of which were similar.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s response?<br />
We can&#8217;t act on opinion, only figures. This is a fob-off as the underlying attitude is &#8220;our target market will use any piece of rubbish product you throw at them &#8211; we know because they did 10 years ago when we started up&#8221;.<br />
The fact that our profits have been plummeting steadily for over a year was not enough!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the frustration I feel is nothing in comparison to that of our users!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph C Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-29589</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph C Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-29589</guid>
		<description>Wonderful article - I agree wholeheartedly with your analyses, especially with regards to the SAA website. Just from a design perspective there is so much wrong with that site as well...I am continually surprised at how well known and assumedly affluent brands can have websites made that are just so poorly thought out, and with such usability pitfalls.

One comment on the Standard Bank login form - they have one feature which I think enhances usability greatly: A small icon that appears within the form input box that is selected, indicating that the caps lock is on. It&#039;s especially useful for password fields where you cannot see the characters you are typing. I often find I get passwords rejected and subsequently find that I have caps lock on so it&#039;s great to see a little feature like this - it should be ubiquitous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful article &#8211; I agree wholeheartedly with your analyses, especially with regards to the SAA website. Just from a design perspective there is so much wrong with that site as well&#8230;I am continually surprised at how well known and assumedly affluent brands can have websites made that are just so poorly thought out, and with such usability pitfalls.</p>
<p>One comment on the Standard Bank login form &#8211; they have one feature which I think enhances usability greatly: A small icon that appears within the form input box that is selected, indicating that the caps lock is on. It&#8217;s especially useful for password fields where you cannot see the characters you are typing. I often find I get passwords rejected and subsequently find that I have caps lock on so it&#8217;s great to see a little feature like this &#8211; it should be ubiquitous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indresh</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-29252</link>
		<dc:creator>Indresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-29252</guid>
		<description>Nice one Phil. I especially get frustrated with the SAA and Vodacom site !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Phil. I especially get frustrated with the SAA and Vodacom site !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microzen</title>
		<link>http://fronttoback.org/2010/05/25/how-to-lose-customers-and-alienate-people/comment-page-1/#comment-29245</link>
		<dc:creator>microzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fronttoback.org/?p=369#comment-29245</guid>
		<description>Thank you Phil for the comment on reset.  I am well into my second decade of website building and I have yet to come across a reason for a prominent reset button.  Yet so many people insist upon it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Phil for the comment on reset.  I am well into my second decade of website building and I have yet to come across a reason for a prominent reset button.  Yet so many people insist upon it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

